Demetriou & Ors v Jenner & Anor [2005] NSWSC 103

Demetriou & Ors v Jenner & Anor [2005] NSWSC 103

The provision made for the first plaintiff was inadequate because, after a fifteen and a half year marriage in which she supported and cared for the deceased during prolonged illness and while she remained responsible for two teenage children, the will left her only a one-fifth interest in the family home and limited other assets. In a small estate dominated by the family home, proper provision for her maintenance required that she receive the whole estate, notwithstanding the competing needs of the deceased's children.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Proceedings Commenced Under S 7 of the Family Provision Act by Summons / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing
Outcome
First plaintiff awarded the whole of the deceased's estate, with costs orders made from the estate.
Legal Topics
['small Estate' "widow's Claim" 'adequacy of Testamentary Provision' 'competing Needs of Children and Widow' 'costs From Estate']
['succession' 'equity' 'family Provision'] ['small Estate' "widow's Claim" 'adequacy of Testamentary Provision' 'competing Needs of Children and Widow' 'costs From Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Proceedings Commenced Under S 7 of the Family Provision Act by Summons / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the deceased's will made inadequate provision for the first plaintiff widow." 'What provision ought to be made for the proper maintenance of the first plaintiff.' 'How the competing claims and needs of the widow, minor children and adult children should be balanced in a small estate consisting substantially of the family home.' 'What costs orders should be made out of the estate.']

Ratio Decidendi

The provision made for the first plaintiff was inadequate because, after a fifteen and a half year marriage in which she supported and cared for the deceased during prolonged illness and while she remained responsible for two teenage children, the will left her only a one-fifth interest in the family home and limited other assets. In a small estate dominated by the family home, proper provision for her maintenance required that she receive the whole estate, notwithstanding the competing needs of the deceased's children.

Court Disposition

First plaintiff awarded the whole of the deceased's estate, with costs orders made from the estate.

Orders

  • ['The first plaintiff is to receive the whole of the estate of the deceased.' 'The first plaintiff is to receive costs on a party party basis.' 'The costs of the second and third plaintiffs are to be paid on an indemnity basis out of the estate from the date of appointment of the tutor.' 'The defendants are to...