TERRY PFEIFFER V CONNORS [2000] NSWSC 452

TERRY PFEIFFER V CONNORS [2000] NSWSC 452

The appeal was dismissed because it was open to the magistrate to accept Mr Connors' evidence that he did not receive the disputed letter or a copy of the second agency agreement, and the magistrate did not reverse the onus of proof or commit an error of law in his reasons. The waiver defence also failed because Mr...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court on Question of Law / Supreme Court Appeal Against Local Court Decision Awarding Recovery of Real Estate Commission
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sole Agency Agreement for Sale of Real Estate' 'property Stock and Business Agents Act 1941 S42 Aa' 'service of Agency Agreement Within 48 Hours' 'recovery of Real Estate Commission' 'waiver by Election' 'adequacy of Reasons on Appeal From Local Court']
['contract' 'agency' 'real Property' 'statutory Consumer Protection' 'civil Procedure'] ['sole Agency Agreement for Sale of Real Estate' 'property Stock and Business Agents Act 1941 S42 Aa' 'service of Agency Agreement Within 48 Hours' 'recovery of Real Estate Commission' 'waiver by Election' 'adequacy of Reasons on Appeal From Local Court']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Local Court on Question of Law / Supreme Court Appeal Against Local Court Decision Awarding Recovery of Real Estate Commission

  1. 1 ['Whether the agent served a copy of the signed agency agreement on the vendors within 48 hours as required by Property Stock and Business Agents Act 1941 s42AA(1)(e).' 'Whether the Local Court magistrate reversed the onus of proof on the question of service of the agency agreement.' "Whether the magistrate failed to give adequate reasons for accepting Mr Connors' evidence and rejecting the agent's case about service." 'Whether the vendors waived or elected not to rely on any statutory right to recover commission by authorising payment of the commission.' 'Whether ignorance of the requirement in s42AA(1)(e) was ignorance of a material fact preventing waiver by election.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because it was open to the magistrate to accept Mr Connors' evidence that he did not receive the disputed letter or a copy of the second agency agreement, and the magistrate did not reverse the onus of proof or commit an error of law in his reasons. The waiver defence also failed because Mr Connors did not know of the statutory obligation under s42AA(1)(e) to serve a signed copy of the agency agreement within 48 hours, and that obligation was a material fact necessary for waiver by election.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal must be dismissed.']