Burrell Solicitors Pty Ltd & Anor v Reavill Farm Pty Ltd & Ors [2016] NSWSC 303
Burrell Solicitors provided misleading and deceptive costs estimates and failed to provide updated reasonable estimates, breaching statutory and contractual duties, but cross-claimants did not rely on the estimates in pursuing litigation and suffered no actionable loss as a result; there was no enforceable agreement to limit charges to $10,000/month; advocate's immunity bars claims relating to conduct of the litigation but not to misleading cost estimates; and costs assessments/judgments establish fair and reasonable remuneration but do not bar separate claims for misleading conduct or breach unless loss is proven, which was not the case here. Cross-claimants are entitled to nominal...
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: Reavill Farm Pty Ltd; Cross Claimant: Champions Quarry Pty Ltd; Cross Claimant: Jeffery Francis Champion; Cross Claimant: Diana Christine Champion; Cross Claimant: Macabil Pty Ltd; Cross Defendant: Burrell Solicitors Pty Ltd; Cross Defendant: John Llewellyn Burrell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Final Judgment in Supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division
- Outcome
- Judgment for cross-claimants against first cross-defendant for nominal damages; all other claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Professional Liability, Advocate's Immunity, Issue Estoppel, Res Judicata, Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reavill Farm Pty Ltd
Cross Claimant
Champions Quarry Pty Ltd
Cross Claimant
Jeffery Francis Champion
Cross Claimant
Diana Christine Champion
Cross Claimant
Macabil Pty Ltd
Cross Claimant
Burrell Solicitors Pty Ltd
Cross Defendant
John Llewellyn Burrell
Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Final Judgment in Supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Burrell Solicitors provided misleading or deceptive cost estimates contrary to statute and contract
- 2 Whether the failure to update costs estimates was a breach of duty
- 3 Whether cross-claimants suffered loss as a result of misleading conduct or contractual breach
Ratio Decidendi
Burrell Solicitors provided misleading and deceptive costs estimates and failed to provide updated reasonable estimates, breaching statutory and contractual duties, but cross-claimants did not rely on the estimates in pursuing litigation and suffered no actionable loss as a result; there was no enforceable agreement to limit charges to $10,000/month; advocate's immunity bars claims relating to conduct of the litigation but not to misleading cost estimates; and costs assessments/judgments establish fair and reasonable remuneration but do not bar separate claims for misleading conduct or breach unless loss is proven, which was not the case here. Cross-claimants are entitled to nominal...
Court Disposition
Judgment for cross-claimants against first cross-defendant for nominal damages; all other claims dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment for the cross-claimants against the first cross-defendant in the sum of $20.
- Cross-claimants' claims for relief otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment