Abbott trading as Piper Alderman v Pilot Development Corporation Pty Limited (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 1178
There was no principle prohibiting extension of a solicitors' equitable lien to damages awarded against a party who gave the usual undertaking as to damages. Although such damages are separate from damages in the main proceedings, they are an integral part of the proceedings in which Pilot was exposed to loss by the injunctions. Piper Alderman acted for Pilot when it succeeded before Windeyer J and in the Court of Appeal and assisted in achieving discharge of the injunctions, which was the step entitling Pilot to seek damages. That provided a sufficient causal link for an equitable lien over any fund available from the inquiry as to damages.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application Concerning Solicitors' Equitable Lien for Costs / Judgment on Application for Declarations and Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted; declarations and orders made, with a stay to allow Capital Access NSW Pty Ltd an opportunity to be heard.
- Legal Topics
- ["solicitors' Equitable Lien for Costs" 'usual Undertaking as to Damages' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'inquiry as to Damages' 'priority Over Secured Creditors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Concerning Solicitors' Equitable Lien for Costs / Judgment on Application for Declarations and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a solicitors' equitable lien for costs applies to damages that may be awarded after an inquiry as to damages consequent upon the usual undertaking as to damages." "Whether Piper Alderman's work for Pilot had a sufficient causal link with any damages recovered under the undertakings as to damages."]
Ratio Decidendi
There was no principle prohibiting extension of a solicitors' equitable lien to damages awarded against a party who gave the usual undertaking as to damages. Although such damages are separate from damages in the main proceedings, they are an integral part of the proceedings in which Pilot was exposed to loss by the injunctions. Piper Alderman acted for Pilot when it succeeded before Windeyer J and in the Court of Appeal and assisted in achieving discharge of the injunctions, which was the step entitling Pilot to seek damages. That provided a sufficient causal link for an equitable lien over any fund available from the inquiry as to damages.
Court Disposition
Application granted; declarations and orders made, with a stay to allow Capital Access NSW Pty Ltd an opportunity to be heard.
Orders
- ['By consent, declaration (a) in the short minute of order initialled and dated 1 November 2006 was made.' 'By consent, the declaration in paragraph (b) of the short minute of order together with Rider No 1 was made.' 'The declaration in paragraph (c) of the short minute of order together with Rider No 2 was made.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment