Grantham & Precise Construction (NSW) Pty Ltd v One Water Naturally Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATCD 19
Rule 38 did not apply because the amount claimed was more than $10,000 but not more than $30,000 and no order under Clause 10(2) of Schedule 4 to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) had been made. One Water's allegations of dishonesty, false or misleading claims and improper conduct were unsupported by evidence, and the Tribunal was not persuaded that any s 60(3) factor established special circumstances warranting an award of costs. The costs application was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / After Dismissal of the Substantive Proceedings
- Outcome
- The application of the respondent for costs is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['special Circumstances for Costs' 'ncat Costs Jurisdiction' 'rule 38 Costs Exception']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / After Dismissal of the Substantive Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special circumstances existed under s 60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) warranting an award of costs to One Water.' 'Whether Rule 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) applied to permit a costs award without special circumstances.' 'Whether Mr Grantham or Precise conducted or prolonged the substantive proceedings in a manner warranting costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 38 did not apply because the amount claimed was more than $10,000 but not more than $30,000 and no order under Clause 10(2) of Schedule 4 to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) had been made. One Water's allegations of dishonesty, false or misleading claims and improper conduct were unsupported by evidence, and the Tribunal was not persuaded that any s 60(3) factor established special circumstances warranting an award of costs. The costs application was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
The application of the respondent for costs is dismissed.
Orders
- ['The Application by One Water for costs is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment