Andrew Sallway and Helen Newman in their capacity as liquidators of MB Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Citadel Group Properties Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 709
Special reasons existed for the proceedings to be determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales: the proceedings were regularly instituted in that Court, were appropriate for the Commercial List and would be dealt with expeditiously; they involved possible orders concerning the Register under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW); they did not appear to require resolution of any significant question involving a special federal matter; the possible special federal matter concerned only the two bankrupt defendants among 15 parties; the first to seventh defendants supported the application; the Haikins' trustee did not oppose it; and no Attorney-General opposed the order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure Motion for an Order Under S 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (cross Vesting) Act 1987 (nsw) That the Proceedings Be Determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion Filed on 14 May 2021
- Outcome
- Motion granted; the proceedings were ordered to be determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
- Legal Topics
- ['special Federal Matter' 'transfer to Federal Court' 'special Reasons Under S 6(3)' "liquidators' Proceedings" 'voidable Transactions' 'real Property Act Register']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure Motion for an Order Under S 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (cross Vesting) Act 1987 (nsw) That the Proceedings Be Determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion Filed on 14 May 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a matter for determination in the proceedings was or could be a special federal matter because the eighth and ninth defendants were undischarged bankrupts and relief might affect provable debts or the title of their trustees to property in their bankrupt estates.' 'Whether there were special reasons under s 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW), other than reasons relevant to the convenience of the parties, warranting that the proceedings be determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.']
Ratio Decidendi
Special reasons existed for the proceedings to be determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales: the proceedings were regularly instituted in that Court, were appropriate for the Commercial List and would be dealt with expeditiously; they involved possible orders concerning the Register under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW); they did not appear to require resolution of any significant question involving a special federal matter; the possible special federal matter concerned only the two bankrupt defendants among 15 parties; the first to seventh defendants supported the application; the Haikins' trustee did not oppose it; and no Attorney-General opposed the order.
Court Disposition
Motion granted; the proceedings were ordered to be determined by the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW), the proceedings be determined by this Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment