R v Cosseddo [2000] NSWSC 446
Having regard to the gravity of the offence, the absence of prior convictions, the offender's age, impaired mental functioning, and the sentencing principles, a limiting term of fourteen years is appropriate under s 23(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Francesco Cosseddo
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Special Hearing; Nomination of Limiting Term Following Finding on Limited Evidence
- Outcome
- Limiting term of 14 years nominated; referral to the Mental Health Review Tribunal; detention ordered in hospital attached to Long Bay Correctional Centre pending Tribunal determination.
- Legal Topics
- Special Hearing, Limiting Term, Unfitness to Plead, Sentencing Principles, Murder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Francesco Cosseddo
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Hearing; Nomination of Limiting Term Following Finding on Limited Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the offender, found unfit to plead, committed the crime of murder
- 2 Determination of an appropriate limiting term under s 23 of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the gravity of the offence, the absence of prior convictions, the offender's age, impaired mental functioning, and the sentencing principles, a limiting term of fourteen years is appropriate under s 23(1)(b) of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act.
Court Disposition
Limiting term of 14 years nominated; referral to the Mental Health Review Tribunal; detention ordered in hospital attached to Long Bay Correctional Centre pending Tribunal determination.
Orders
- The offender is to be detained for a limiting term of fourteen years from 23 May 2000.
- The offender is referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal under s 24 of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment