White Rock Wind Farm Pty Ltd v Dulhunty (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1631
The court held that consequential orders were necessary to give effect to its principal judgment and to resolve disagreements on cost allocation and the scope of obligations under the Deed of Release; White Rock Wind Farm Pty Ltd was ordered to specifically perform obligations regarding the Substation Land and various remediation works per settled agreements, and costs orders were made to reflect responsibility and reasonableness in litigation conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders Following Principal Judgment / Post Judgment Orders
- Outcome
- Consequential orders granted; claims variously dismissed, specific performance ordered, costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['specific Performance' 'contract Enforcement' 'costs Orders' 'easements' 'settlement Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders Following Principal Judgment / Post Judgment Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Orders to effect principal judgment' 'Dispute regarding specific performance of Deed of Release' 'Obligation to create easements and undertake remediation works' 'Allocation of costs for various claims']
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that consequential orders were necessary to give effect to its principal judgment and to resolve disagreements on cost allocation and the scope of obligations under the Deed of Release; White Rock Wind Farm Pty Ltd was ordered to specifically perform obligations regarding the Substation Land and various remediation works per settled agreements, and costs orders were made to reflect responsibility and reasonableness in litigation conduct.
Court Disposition
Consequential orders granted; claims variously dismissed, specific performance ordered, costs orders made.
Orders
- ["Order that the plaintiff's claims in prayers 1 and 3 of the summons be dismissed." "Note that the plaintiff's claim for relief in prayer 2 was abandoned at hearing." 'Dismiss plaintiff’s claims for relief in prayers 4 and 5 of the summons.' 'Note dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for prayers 4 and 5 is made without...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment