Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd & Anor v Akbarian & Ors [2002] NSWSC 385
Because the loan agreement required a registered first mortgage in favour of Permanent Trustee and the first and second defendants were obliged to do all things necessary to achieve that result, they had to cause Arash & Arezu Pty Ltd to execute a proper postponement of mortgage; the plaintiffs were therefore entitled to specific performance notwithstanding that the initial form error was attributable to the plaintiffs' solicitor.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of a Loan Agreement Concerning Mortgage Priority / Hearing and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs granted declaratory and specific performance relief; first and second defendants ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['specific Performance' 'mortgage Priority' 'registered First Mortgage' 'postponement of Mortgage' 'loan Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of a Loan Agreement Concerning Mortgage Priority / Hearing and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the first and second defendants were required under the loan agreement to take all necessary steps to ensure that Permanent Trustee obtained a registered first mortgage over 35 Lancaster Avenue, St Ives.' 'Whether the defendants were required to cause Arash & Arezu Pty Ltd to execute a postponement of mortgage in proper form.' "Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to specific performance despite the issue having initially arisen because the plaintiffs' solicitor supplied the wrong form."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the loan agreement required a registered first mortgage in favour of Permanent Trustee and the first and second defendants were obliged to do all things necessary to achieve that result, they had to cause Arash & Arezu Pty Ltd to execute a proper postponement of mortgage; the plaintiffs were therefore entitled to specific performance notwithstanding that the initial form error was attributable to the plaintiffs' solicitor.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs granted declaratory and specific performance relief; first and second defendants ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs.
Orders
- ['Declaration that the first and second plaintiffs are entitled to have the loan agreement between the first and second plaintiffs and the first and second defendants dated 21 November 2000 specifically performed and carried into execution.' 'The first and second defendants specifically perform and carry into...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment