R v Andrew SWAN [2021] NSWDC 783

R v Andrew SWAN [2021] NSWDC 783

The offender's three offences warranted an aggregate custodial sentence. The intimidation was below mid-range, the common assault was about mid-range, and the armed robbery was towards the lower end for offences of that type but remained serious despite the drug-related background. The offender's criminal history reduced leniency and the offences were aggravated by breach of a Community Correction Order, but his deprived background, addiction, depressive disorder, early guilty pleas, custodial hardship and need for supervision justified mitigation and a finding of special circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas
Outcome
Offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months.
Legal Topics
['stalk or Intimidate' 'armed Robbery' 'common Assault' 'bugmy Principles' 'henry Guideline Judgment' 'special Circumstances' 'guilty Plea Discount']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['stalk or Intimidate' 'armed Robbery' 'common Assault' 'bugmy Principles' 'henry Guideline Judgment' 'special Circumstances' 'guilty Plea Discount']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Assessment of the objective seriousness of the stalk/intimidate, common assault and armed robbery offences.' 'Application of the Henry guideline judgment to the robbery whilst armed offence.' "Whether the offender's deprived background, early exposure to violence and drug addiction reduced moral culpability under Bugmy principles." "Whether the offender's depressive disorder affected moral culpability and the weight to be given to general deterrence and denunciation." 'Whether special circumstances justified an extended period of supervision on parole.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender's three offences warranted an aggregate custodial sentence. The intimidation was below mid-range, the common assault was about mid-range, and the armed robbery was towards the lower end for offences of that type but remained serious despite the drug-related background. The offender's criminal history reduced leniency and the offences were aggravated by breach of a Community Correction Order, but his deprived background, addiction, depressive disorder, early guilty pleas, custodial hardship and need for supervision justified mitigation and a finding of special circumstances.

Court Disposition

Offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months.

Orders

  • ['Indicative sentence for the s 13(1) stalk/intimidate offence: 6 months.' 'Indicative sentence for the s 61 common assault offence: 12 months.' 'Indicative sentence for the s 97(1) robbery whilst armed offence: 2 years 9 months.' 'Aggregate sentence: imprisonment for 3 years 3 months.' 'Special circumstances found;...