Cobar Corporation Limited and Rubind Henrik Corbett (Trustee) v Attorney-General (NSW) [1909] HCA 52
No suit or action lies for the recovery of stamp duty or the fine of 20% under the Stamp Duties Act 1898 (N.S.W.) or the Stamp Duties (Amendment) Act 1904 (N.S.W.) unless expressly provided. Even if the £25 chargeable under sec. 17 of the Act of 1904 is a penalty, a suit in equity is not an 'action of debt in the Supreme Court' within sec. 69 of the Act of 1898, and is not maintainable. The prescribed statutory remedies and penalties are exclusive, and the general law does not supply additional remedies.
- Parties
- Appellants / Defendants: The Cobar Corporation Limited and Rubind Henrik; Respondent / Informant: The Attorney-General for New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division, to the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Decree appealed from discharged. Suit dismissed with costs and costs of the injunction. Respondent to pay the costs of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Stamp Duties, Procedural Law, Enforcement of Taxation Debts, Penalties and Fines, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Cobar Corporation Limited and Rubind Henrik
Appellants / Defendants
The Attorney-General for New South Wales
Respondent / Informant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division, to the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a suit in equity lies for recovery of stamp duty or fines under the Stamp Duties Act 1898 (N.S.W.) and Stamp Duties (Amendment) Act 1904 (N.S.W.)
- 2 Whether the Act imposes a personal liability to pay stamp duty or fines recoverable by action or suit, or if recovery is limited to methods provided by the statutes
- 3 Whether a penalty or fine may be recovered in an equity suit under the statutory regime
Ratio Decidendi
No suit or action lies for the recovery of stamp duty or the fine of 20% under the Stamp Duties Act 1898 (N.S.W.) or the Stamp Duties (Amendment) Act 1904 (N.S.W.) unless expressly provided. Even if the £25 chargeable under sec. 17 of the Act of 1904 is a penalty, a suit in equity is not an 'action of debt in the Supreme Court' within sec. 69 of the Act of 1898, and is not maintainable. The prescribed statutory remedies and penalties are exclusive, and the general law does not supply additional remedies.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Decree appealed from discharged. Suit dismissed with costs and costs of the injunction. Respondent to pay the costs of the appeal.
Orders
- Decree on appeal set aside.
- Suit dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment