Griffin Energy Group Pty Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v ICICI Bank Limited [2015] NSWCA 29
The appellants could not properly deliver a declaration under the letters of credit that the amount claimed was 'due and payable' until 3 March 2015, but the expiry date for timely presentation under the letters was 2 March 2015. Both the Sale Agreement and letters of credit definitions and their interaction did not permit extension beyond 2 March 2015 for presentation. Therefore, the appellants could not claim under the letters, and the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Griffin Energy Group Pty Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement); Second Appellant: Carpenter Mine Management Holdings Pty Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement); First Respondent: ICICI Bank Limited (Singapore Branch); Second Respondent: Standard Chartered Bank; Third Respondent: National Australia Bank Limited; Fourth Respondent: Lanco Resources Australia Pty Ltd; Fifth Respondent: Lanco International Pte Ltd; Sixth Respondent: Lanco Infratech Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standby Letters of Credit, Interpretation of Business Day, Construction of Contractual Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Griffin Energy Group Pty Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement)
First Appellant
Carpenter Mine Management Holdings Pty Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement)
Second Appellant
ICICI Bank Limited (Singapore Branch)
First Respondent
Standard Chartered Bank
Second Respondent
National Australia Bank Limited
Third Respondent
Lanco Resources Australia Pty Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Lanco International Pte Ltd
Fifth Respondent
Lanco Infratech Limited
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amounts claimed under the letters of credit are 'due and payable'
- 2 Whether the letters of credit expired before the beneficiary was entitled to present a draft
- 3 Interpretation of 'Business Day' in contract and letters of credit
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants could not properly deliver a declaration under the letters of credit that the amount claimed was 'due and payable' until 3 March 2015, but the expiry date for timely presentation under the letters was 2 March 2015. Both the Sale Agreement and letters of credit definitions and their interaction did not permit extension beyond 2 March 2015 for presentation. Therefore, the appellants could not claim under the letters, and the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellants pay respondents' costs of the appeal.
- Cross-appellant pay cross-respondents' costs of the cross-appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment