CAMILLERI v PUDIG [1999] NSWCA 257
Leave to appeal was refused because Windeyer J did not disclose any error of principle or application of principle in holding that the Magistrate's findings on knowledge and reliance were open, and the case was not appropriate for a grant of leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal From a Supreme Court Decision Dismissing a Stated Case From Local Court Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stated Case From Magistrate' 'leave to Appeal' 'second Hand Car Sale' 'misrepresentation' 'reliance' 'drawing Inferences of Fact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal From a Supreme Court Decision Dismissing a Stated Case From Local Court Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it was open to the Magistrate to find that the claimant knew of the false service booklet entries.' 'Whether it was open to the Magistrate to find that the opponent relied on the representation when deciding to purchase the vehicle.' "Whether Windeyer J erred in concluding that the Magistrate's findings were open." 'Whether alleged misapplication of established principle justified granting leave to appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because Windeyer J did not disclose any error of principle or application of principle in holding that the Magistrate's findings on knowledge and reliance were open, and the case was not appropriate for a grant of leave.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment