SZMZV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1380
The Tribunal was not satisfied that the appellants would be denied adequate state protection for any Convention reason, including religion, nor that relocation within Malaysia was unreasonable or impracticable. No jurisdictional error was demonstrated by the Tribunal or the Federal Magistrates Court. The appeal failed on both grounds.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['state Protection' 'differential Treatment Based on Religion' 'reasonableness of Relocation' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellants would be denied adequate state protection in Malaysia due to religion' 'Whether the appellants would be subject to differential treatment by authorities based on religion' 'Whether it was reasonable (practicable) for the appellants to relocate within Malaysia' 'Whether the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in its approach']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not satisfied that the appellants would be denied adequate state protection for any Convention reason, including religion, nor that relocation within Malaysia was unreasonable or impracticable. No jurisdictional error was demonstrated by the Tribunal or the Federal Magistrates Court. The appeal failed on both grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellants pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment