Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Limited v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 3) [2021] FCA 348
The referee report was rejected in its entirety because it misconceived the legal principles for causation and quantification required by s 545(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act, applying an incorrect standard that required proof of sole or substantial causation and rejected partial compensation where only a fraction of the loss could be proved as caused by the contravention. The Court held that statutory causation under s 545(2)(b) allows compensation for loss proved to be caused by the contravention, not requiring exclusive causation and permitting partial awards. In light of these findings, the Court ordered adjusted allocation of the costs of the reference and set the matter down for final...
- Parties
- First Applicant: Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Limited; Second Applicant: Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Ltd; First Applicant: Qube Logistics (NSW) Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd; Third Applicant: Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union; Second Respondent: Mr Paul McAleer; Third Respondent: Mr Paul Keating
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Referee Report and Preparation for Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Referee report rejected in full; matter set for final hearing; cost orders made allocating reference costs one-third among party groups.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Compensation, Factual and Legal Causation, Discretion Under Fair Work Act, Principles for Adopting Referee Report
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Limited
First Applicant
Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Qube Logistics (NSW) Pty Ltd
First Applicant
Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd
Third Applicant
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
First Respondent
Mr Paul McAleer
Second Respondent
Mr Paul Keating
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Referee Report and Preparation for Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the referee report on statutory compensation should be adopted or rejected
- 2 Correct principles and application of factual and legal causation under s 545(2)(b) Fair Work Act
- 3 Allocation of costs for reference and referee's report
Ratio Decidendi
The referee report was rejected in its entirety because it misconceived the legal principles for causation and quantification required by s 545(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act, applying an incorrect standard that required proof of sole or substantial causation and rejected partial compensation where only a fraction of the loss could be proved as caused by the contravention. The Court held that statutory causation under s 545(2)(b) allows compensation for loss proved to be caused by the contravention, not requiring exclusive causation and permitting partial awards. In light of these findings, the Court ordered adjusted allocation of the costs of the reference and set the matter down for final...
Court Disposition
Referee report rejected in full; matter set for final hearing; cost orders made allocating reference costs one-third among party groups.
Orders
- Pursuant to s 54A(3)(c) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, the referee report be rejected.
- Subject to further order, all parties involved in the reference (Patricks, Qube, and respondent parties) each pay one-third of the costs of the reference, being one-half of the amount invoiced by the referee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment