Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airliban SAL [1975] HCA 6

Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airliban SAL [1975] HCA 6

By majority, the High Court held that a statement implying that potential air travellers on the plaintiff's airline faced a serious risk of hijacking by Israelis could amount to an imputation concerning the plaintiff, likely to injure it in its trade, and thus was capable of being defamatory under s.5 Defamation Act 1958 (NSW). The first innuendo should not have been withdrawn from the jury. The minority (Stephen J) preferred a narrower construction requiring reflection on conduct or responsibility.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Determination of Appeal and Cross Appeal in the High Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal and cross-appeal each dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['statutory Definition of Defamation' 'imputation Concerning a Person Under S.5 Defamation Act 1958 (nsw)' 'defamation of Corporations' 'false/popular Innuendo' 'scope of Statutory Defamation Post Common Law']
['defamation' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['statutory Definition of Defamation' 'imputation Concerning a Person Under S.5 Defamation Act 1958 (nsw)' 'defamation of Corporations' 'false/popular Innuendo' 'scope of Statutory Defamation Post Common Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Determination of Appeal and Cross Appeal in the High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the publication was capable of conveying the first pleaded innuendo to a reasonable reader' "Whether the first innuendo constitutes an 'imputation concerning' the plaintiff likely to injure it in its trade under s 5 Defamation Act 1958 (NSW)" 'Whether s 5 requires the imputation to relate to conduct or responsibility of the plaintiff' "Proper construction of 'imputation concerning any person' under statutory defamation"]

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the High Court held that a statement implying that potential air travellers on the plaintiff's airline faced a serious risk of hijacking by Israelis could amount to an imputation concerning the plaintiff, likely to injure it in its trade, and thus was capable of being defamatory under s.5 Defamation Act 1958 (NSW). The first innuendo should not have been withdrawn from the jury. The minority (Stephen J) preferred a narrower construction requiring reflection on conduct or responsibility.

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross-appeal each dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' 'Cross-appeal dismissed with costs.']