Newsnet Pty Limited v Patching [2011] NSWSC 690
Service of the application to set aside the statutory demand and supporting affidavit by facsimile at the address for service stated in the statutory demand is effective upon receipt and printing at the office of the creditor's solicitors, regardless of whether it is personally received by a person; there is a real question to be tried as to whether service was effected within time, and at least one ground of dispute is raised in the supporting affidavit. Thus, summary dismissal is inappropriate.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Newsnet Pty Limited; Defendant/applicant: Roy Edward Patching
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application for Summary Dismissal of Plaintiff's Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Defendant's interlocutory process for summary dismissal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Service of Documents, Interlocutory Applications, Summary Dismissal, Supporting Affidavits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Newsnet Pty Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Roy Edward Patching
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application for Summary Dismissal of Plaintiff's Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of the plaintiff's application to set aside statutory demand was effected within the 21-day period required by s 459G, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether service by facsimile at the address for service stated in the demand is good service under s 459G(3)(b)
- 3 Whether the supporting affidavit met the minimum requirements as per the Graywinter principle
Ratio Decidendi
Service of the application to set aside the statutory demand and supporting affidavit by facsimile at the address for service stated in the statutory demand is effective upon receipt and printing at the office of the creditor's solicitors, regardless of whether it is personally received by a person; there is a real question to be tried as to whether service was effected within time, and at least one ground of dispute is raised in the supporting affidavit. Thus, summary dismissal is inappropriate.
Court Disposition
Defendant's interlocutory process for summary dismissal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Order that the defendant's interlocutory process filed on 30 May 2011 be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment