ALJ22 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1427
A decision by the Tribunal that it lacks jurisdiction to review a Part 7-reviewable decision due to an out-of-time application is not a 'decision of the Tribunal under section 415' for the purposes of s 417 of the Migration Act. As no decision under s 415 was made, the precondition for Ministerial intervention under s 417 was not satisfied; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: ALJ22; Second Applicant: ALK22; Third Applicant: BHD24; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Position Number: 60019093 Department of Home Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Jurisdiction of Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Ministerial Intervention – S 417 Migration Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ALJ22
First Applicant
ALK22
Second Applicant
BHD24
Third Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Position Number: 60019093 Department of Home Affairs
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a decision by the Tribunal that it lacked jurisdiction is ‘a decision of the Tribunal under section 415’ for the purposes of s 417 of the Migration Act
- 2 Whether the Minister has power under s 417 to substitute a more favourable decision where the Tribunal refused a merits review application as out of time
Ratio Decidendi
A decision by the Tribunal that it lacks jurisdiction to review a Part 7-reviewable decision due to an out-of-time application is not a 'decision of the Tribunal under section 415' for the purposes of s 417 of the Migration Act. As no decision under s 415 was made, the precondition for Ministerial intervention under s 417 was not satisfied; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are to pay the respondents' costs, as agreed or taxed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment