Re LS [2017] NSWSC 1667
The Court made the order sought because LS was incapable of making a will, there was reason to believe the proposed will was one LS would have made if she had testamentary capacity, the Plaintiff was an appropriate applicant, and in the urgent circumstances adequate steps for representation under s 22(e) were satisfied notwithstanding that LS's mother and sisters had not been informed, since the proposed will advanced rather than adversely affected their interests and avoided the risk that they would receive no benefit on intestacy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Duty Application for the Making of a Statutory Will Pursuant to Division 2 of the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Equity Duty List Hearing
- Outcome
- Order sought made.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Wills' 'testamentary Capacity' 'adequate Representation of Persons With a Legitimate Interest' 'intestacy' 'de Facto Relationships']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Urgent Duty Application for the Making of a Statutory Will Pursuant to Division 2 of the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Equity Duty List Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether LS was incapable of making a will for the purposes of s 22(a) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Whether there was reason to believe the proposed will was one which LS would have made if she had testamentary capacity for the purposes of s 22(b) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Whether the Plaintiff was an appropriate person to apply for the order for the purposes of s 22(d) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' "Whether adequate steps had been taken to allow representation of all persons with a legitimate interest in the application for the purposes of s 22(e) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), despite LS's mother and sisters not being informed of the application."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court made the order sought because LS was incapable of making a will, there was reason to believe the proposed will was one LS would have made if she had testamentary capacity, the Plaintiff was an appropriate applicant, and in the urgent circumstances adequate steps for representation under s 22(e) were satisfied notwithstanding that LS's mother and sisters had not been informed, since the proposed will advanced rather than adversely affected their interests and avoided the risk that they would receive no benefit on intestacy.
Court Disposition
Order sought made.
Orders
- ['The order sought for the making of the proposed statutory will was made.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment