COUNCIL OF THE SHIRE OF WELLINGTON v BRINCAT [1991] NSWCA 65
A stay of execution should be granted where the appeal is not hopeless and there is a real risk that the moneys paid may not be repaid if the appellant succeeds, particularly when there is no urgent need for the funds by the respondent.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Council of the Shire of Wellington; Opponent/respondent: Brincat
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted pending appeal; case to be listed for Registrar's callover; claimant to pay opponent's costs of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Process, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Council of the Shire of Wellington
Claimant/appellant
Brincat
Opponent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
A stay of execution should be granted where the appeal is not hopeless and there is a real risk that the moneys paid may not be repaid if the appellant succeeds, particularly when there is no urgent need for the funds by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted pending appeal; case to be listed for Registrar's callover; claimant to pay opponent's costs of the motion.
Orders
- Execution of the judgment in favour of the opponent be stayed pending determination of the appeal.
- Case to be placed in the Registrar's callover for 3 July 1991 to fix a hearing date for the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment