Australian Surf Life Saver Pty Ltd v S & I Publishing Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1092
Although the proposed appeal was fairly arguable, the loss, inconvenience and possible further changes identified by the applicant for the stay were ordinary consequences of an unsuccessful respondent wishing to appeal an injunction in a commercial misleading conduct case. Nothing was demonstrated to make this an appropriate case for a stay pending appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal / Heard on 24 August 1998 After Orders Made by Moore J on 20 August 1998
- Outcome
- Application refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Orders Pending Appeal' 'injunctive Relief' 'misleading Conduct' 'magazine Get Up']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal / Heard on 24 August 1998 After Orders Made by Moore J on 20 August 1998
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the orders made by Moore J on 20 August 1998 should be stayed pending determination of an appeal.' 'Whether the applicant for the stay demonstrated an appropriate case warranting the exercise of discretion in its favour.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the proposed appeal was fairly arguable, the loss, inconvenience and possible further changes identified by the applicant for the stay were ordinary consequences of an unsuccessful respondent wishing to appeal an injunction in a commercial misleading conduct case. Nothing was demonstrated to make this an appropriate case for a stay pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Application refused with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is refused.' "The applicant to the Notice of Motion is to pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment