Colin Biggers & Paisley Pty Limited t/as Colin Biggers and Paisley v McKenzie (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1428
A stay of execution and further enforcement of the judgment was warranted because the applicant's professional negligence claim was fairly arguable and, if successful, was likely to exceed the judgment amount; the enforcement arose by administrative certification, not determination after contested hearing, and justice favoured a temporary stay until the negligence proceedings were determined or further order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motion for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Execution notice and enforcement stayed; costs awarded to applicant except for preparation of Exhibit B.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Proceedings' 'enforcement of Judgment' 'professional Negligence' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of execution and enforcement of judgment should be granted pending determination of professional negligence proceedings' 'Whether the stay is in the interests of justice']
Ratio Decidendi
A stay of execution and further enforcement of the judgment was warranted because the applicant's professional negligence claim was fairly arguable and, if successful, was likely to exceed the judgment amount; the enforcement arose by administrative certification, not determination after contested hearing, and justice favoured a temporary stay until the negligence proceedings were determined or further order.
Court Disposition
Execution notice and enforcement stayed; costs awarded to applicant except for preparation of Exhibit B.
Orders
- ['The execution notice and any step in enforcement of the judgment obtained on 1 December 2016 is stayed until either further order of the Court or the determination of the professional negligence proceedings in matter number 2017/200864, whichever is the earlier.' "The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment