PANGAS v LORD [1997] NSWCA 244

PANGAS v LORD [1997] NSWCA 244

Application for stay refused as no persuasive grounds shown; appeal had minimal prospect of success; orders were made to enable enforcement of monetary judgments in favour of Mrs Lord and setting aside the mortgage to the extent necessary; priority properly determined under s 85 Family Law Act.

Parties
Applicant/seventh Defendant: Winston Pangas; Respondent/first Defendant: Robynne Lord (formerly Robynne Pangas); Second Defendant: Peter Pangas
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 December 1997
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion/application for Stay / Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay refused with costs.
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Enforcement of Judgments, Setting Aside Dispositions Under S 85 Family Law Act, Priority of Encumbrances, Appeal Procedures

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Winston Pangas

Applicant/seventh Defendant

Robynne Lord (formerly Robynne Pangas)

Respondent/first Defendant

Peter Pangas

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion/application for Stay / Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a stay should be granted on enforcement of orders made by Bryson J on 7 October 1997 pending appeal
  2. 2 Whether the mortgage granted to Winston Pangas was properly set aside under s 85 of the Family Law Act
  3. 3 Whether the writ of execution or mortgage had priority

Ratio Decidendi

Application for stay refused as no persuasive grounds shown; appeal had minimal prospect of success; orders were made to enable enforcement of monetary judgments in favour of Mrs Lord and setting aside the mortgage to the extent necessary; priority properly determined under s 85 Family Law Act.

Court Disposition

Application for stay refused with costs.

Orders

  • Application for stay is refused.
  • Applicant to pay costs of the application.