PANGAS v LORD [1997] NSWCA 244
Application for stay refused as no persuasive grounds shown; appeal had minimal prospect of success; orders were made to enable enforcement of monetary judgments in favour of Mrs Lord and setting aside the mortgage to the extent necessary; priority properly determined under s 85 Family Law Act.
- Parties
- Applicant/seventh Defendant: Winston Pangas; Respondent/first Defendant: Robynne Lord (formerly Robynne Pangas); Second Defendant: Peter Pangas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion/application for Stay / Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Enforcement of Judgments, Setting Aside Dispositions Under S 85 Family Law Act, Priority of Encumbrances, Appeal Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Winston Pangas
Applicant/seventh Defendant
Robynne Lord (formerly Robynne Pangas)
Respondent/first Defendant
Peter Pangas
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion/application for Stay / Application for Stay of Orders Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay should be granted on enforcement of orders made by Bryson J on 7 October 1997 pending appeal
- 2 Whether the mortgage granted to Winston Pangas was properly set aside under s 85 of the Family Law Act
- 3 Whether the writ of execution or mortgage had priority
Ratio Decidendi
Application for stay refused as no persuasive grounds shown; appeal had minimal prospect of success; orders were made to enable enforcement of monetary judgments in favour of Mrs Lord and setting aside the mortgage to the extent necessary; priority properly determined under s 85 Family Law Act.
Court Disposition
Application for stay refused with costs.
Orders
- Application for stay is refused.
- Applicant to pay costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment