State Bank of NSW v Currabubula Holdings P/L & Anor [1999] NSWCA 181
Although the Court had jurisdiction to grant the stay sought, the Bank proved no grounds for its fear that Currabubula Holdings Pty Limited would not repay the judgment sum, and the evidence indicated Currabubula had a substantial surplus of assets over liabilities; the Notice of Motion was therefore dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Application
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay Pending Appeal' 'proof of Risk of Non Repayment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant State Bank of NSW should obtain a stay of Einstein J's order pending determination of the appeal." 'Whether the Bank proved grounds for its fear that it would not be repaid if a stay were refused.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Court had jurisdiction to grant the stay sought, the Bank proved no grounds for its fear that Currabubula Holdings Pty Limited would not repay the judgment sum, and the evidence indicated Currabubula had a substantial surplus of assets over liabilities; the Notice of Motion was therefore dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment