Najjar v Najjar [2015] NSWSC 377
The plaintiffs are not prevented by res judicata or issue estoppel from advancing their claims because the causes of action were not adjudicated in the prior proceedings, and the plaintiffs were not parties at the relevant time. There is no abuse of process, as their participation and the proceedings' nature did not amount to an impermissible re-litigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Strike Out / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['strike Out Application' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel' 'abuse of Process' 're Litigation of Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Strike Out / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs' claims are precluded by res judicata or issue estoppel" 'Whether the proceedings constitute an abuse of process by re-litigating issues previously determined']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs are not prevented by res judicata or issue estoppel from advancing their claims because the causes of action were not adjudicated in the prior proceedings, and the plaintiffs were not parties at the relevant time. There is no abuse of process, as their participation and the proceedings' nature did not amount to an impermissible re-litigation.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["Defendants' Notice of Motion filed on 12 February 2015 is dismissed with costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment