Layrir Pty Ltd & 44 ors v Jack Jordan & 6 ors [2006] NSWSC 1228
It would be an inappropriate exercise of discretion to strike out the claims against the directors at this stage, as material facts have been pleaded and discovery/interrogatories may yield further evidence. Relief sought by the directors is refused, costs will be costs in the cause.
- Parties
- Applicants: Jack Jordan and ors; Respondents: Layrir Pty Limited and ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Application, Accessory Liability, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Summary Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jack Jordan and ors
Applicants
Layrir Pty Limited and ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claims against certain directors should be struck out for failing to plead material facts of knowing involvement in alleged contraventions under the Trade Practices Act
- 2 Whether the pleading provides a reasonable cause of action under s75B(c) of the Trade Practices Act
- 3 Appropriateness of summary dismissal given evidentiary gaps potentially remediable by discovery or interrogatories
Ratio Decidendi
It would be an inappropriate exercise of discretion to strike out the claims against the directors at this stage, as material facts have been pleaded and discovery/interrogatories may yield further evidence. Relief sought by the directors is refused, costs will be costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- Leave to the Plaintiffs to file Second Amended Statement of Claim within 14 days
- Notice of Motion is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment