The Public Trustee of South Australia (As Legal Personal of the Estate of the late John Alfred Richardson) v Clifton Financial Services Pty Ltd & Ors (No. 1) [2004] NSWDDT 38
The subpoena was not set aside because the documents sought could be relevant to demonstrating part of the chain of supply from CSR to the second defendant and the first defendant, and there was no material before the Tribunal confirming that compliance with the restricted subpoena would be unreasonably burdensome.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Dust Diseases Proceeding / Interlocutory Application by the Third Defendant to Set Aside a Subpoena
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicant to pay respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoena' 'relevance' 'burdensome Compliance' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Dust Diseases Proceeding / Interlocutory Application by the Third Defendant to Set Aside a Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subpoena should be set aside because the documents sought were not relevant.' 'Whether the subpoena should be set aside or compliance relieved because compliance was too burdensome, particularly at a late stage.']
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena was not set aside because the documents sought could be relevant to demonstrating part of the chain of supply from CSR to the second defendant and the first defendant, and there was no material before the Tribunal confirming that compliance with the restricted subpoena would be unreasonably burdensome.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicant to pay respondent's costs.
Orders
- ['The subpoena is not set aside.' 'The present application is dismissed.' "Applicant to pay respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment