R v Warwick (No.12) [2018] NSWSC 522
The subpoena in respect of paragraphs 2, 9, 15-17, and part of paragraph 21 was set aside because it amounted to a fishing expedition, lacked the requisite specificity, was oppressive, and no legitimate forensic purpose was demonstrated for the documents sought.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Accused: Leonard John Warwick; Third Party Recipient of Subpoena: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Subpoena
- Outcome
- Application to set aside subpoena granted in part; challenged parts of the subpoena set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Subpoena, Discovery, Forensic Purpose, Fishing Expedition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Leonard John Warwick
Accused
Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia
Third Party Recipient of Subpoena
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subpoena constituted a fishing expedition and should be set aside in part for lack of legitimate forensic purpose;
- 2 Whether the subpoena's requests were oppressive in nature or sufficiently specific;
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena in respect of paragraphs 2, 9, 15-17, and part of paragraph 21 was set aside because it amounted to a fishing expedition, lacked the requisite specificity, was oppressive, and no legitimate forensic purpose was demonstrated for the documents sought.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside subpoena granted in part; challenged parts of the subpoena set aside.
Orders
- Set aside the subpoena addressed to the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia insofar as the Schedule contains paragraphs 2, 9, 15-17 (inclusive) and part of paragraph 21.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment