Havas v State of New South Wales [2023] NSWDC 208
The subpoenas and related notice should not be set aside because the plaintiff was entitled to test the State's assertion that Detective Thom was not involved in tipping off the press, and it was conceivable beyond speculation that documents about other officers' dealings with the press might cast light on Detective Thom's involvement or state of mind. The low threshold of apparent relevance was satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Malicious Prosecution Claim / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoenas and a Notice to Admit
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'notice to Admit Facts' 'malicious Prosecution' 'apparent Relevance' 'malice' 'police Tip Off to Press']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Malicious Prosecution Claim / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoenas and a Notice to Admit
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether subpoenas issued by the plaintiff to journalists and telecommunication providers should be set aside.' "Whether the plaintiff's notice to admit should be set aside." "Whether documents concerning police dealings with the press had apparent relevance to Detective Thom's state of mind for the malicious prosecution claim."]
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoenas and related notice should not be set aside because the plaintiff was entitled to test the State's assertion that Detective Thom was not involved in tipping off the press, and it was conceivable beyond speculation that documents about other officers' dealings with the press might cast light on Detective Thom's involvement or state of mind. The low threshold of apparent relevance was satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The amended motion will be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment