In the matter of Gandangara Services Limited (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 629
The documents sought via subpoenas are relevant to the determination of whether special purpose companies are performing functions given by statute to the Land Council, and in the absence of objection as to oppression or excessive breadth, the subpoenas should not be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Application to Set Aside Subpoenas
- Outcome
- Application to set aside subpoenas dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'relevance' 'oppression']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Application to Set Aside Subpoenas
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether subpoenas served are relevant to the issues in dispute' 'Whether subpoenas are oppressive or too broad']
Ratio Decidendi
The documents sought via subpoenas are relevant to the determination of whether special purpose companies are performing functions given by statute to the Land Council, and in the absence of objection as to oppression or excessive breadth, the subpoenas should not be set aside.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside subpoenas dismissed
Orders
- ['Subpoenas not set aside']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment