ISAACS v CACHIA [1989] NSWCA 105
Having succeeded on a question of law in the appeal and presented arguments responsibly, the claimants were entitled to the grant of a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, the statutory prerequisites for the grant having been satisfied.
- Parties
- Claimant: Isaacs; Opponent: Cachia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Certificate (costs) / Post Appeal Motion
- Outcome
- Certificate granted to claimants under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 for the costs of the opponent's appeal. No order as to costs of the certificate application.
- Legal Topics
- Suitors' Fund Certificate, Taxation of Costs, Litigant in Person Costs, Discretion Under Suitors' Fund Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaacs
Claimant
Cachia
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Certificate (costs) / Post Appeal Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 should be granted to the claimants in respect of the opponent's appeal costs
- 2 Whether a litigant opposing a certificate has standing to do so
- 3 Whether alleged 'irresponsible' arguments justify refusal of certificate
Ratio Decidendi
Having succeeded on a question of law in the appeal and presented arguments responsibly, the claimants were entitled to the grant of a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, the statutory prerequisites for the grant having been satisfied.
Court Disposition
Certificate granted to claimants under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 for the costs of the opponent's appeal. No order as to costs of the certificate application.
Orders
- Certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 to claimants with respect to the costs of the opponent's appeal to this Court.
- No order as to the costs of the application for the certificate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment