Advance Innovative Solutions Pty Limited (in liquidation) v X-Dem Group (Aust) Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] NSWSC 1112

Advance Innovative Solutions Pty Limited (in liquidation) v X-Dem Group (Aust) Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] NSWSC 1112

The Plaintiff is ordered to provide security for the Second Defendant's future costs in two tranches, as its corporate status and likely inability to pay costs if unsuccessful meets the statutory threshold and discretion favours limited security. The application for summary dismissal is refused as the claims are not obviously unsustainable, and proper identification of claims should occur on pleadings. Leave is granted for the Plaintiff to proceed against the First Defendant in liquidation, as such leave is discretionary and unopposed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Summary Dismissal and Security for Costs
Outcome
Application for summary dismissal refused; security for costs granted in part; leave to proceed against First Defendant granted; proceedings to continue on pleadings.
Legal Topics
['summary Dismissal' 'security for Costs' 'leave to Proceed Against Company in Liquidation']
['corporate Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['summary Dismissal' 'security for Costs' 'leave to Proceed Against Company in Liquidation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Summary Dismissal and Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether proceedings against Second Defendant are frivolous or vexatious, disclose no reasonable cause of action, or constitute an abuse of process' 'Whether security for costs should be ordered against the Plaintiff' 'Whether leave should be granted to proceed against First Defendant in liquidation']

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff is ordered to provide security for the Second Defendant's future costs in two tranches, as its corporate status and likely inability to pay costs if unsuccessful meets the statutory threshold and discretion favours limited security. The application for summary dismissal is refused as the claims are not obviously unsustainable, and proper identification of claims should occur on pleadings. Leave is granted for the Plaintiff to proceed against the First Defendant in liquidation, as such leave is discretionary and unopposed.

Court Disposition

Application for summary dismissal refused; security for costs granted in part; leave to proceed against First Defendant granted; proceedings to continue on pleadings.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiff to provide security for Second Defendant's costs ($7,000 within 28 days; $14,000 no later than 21 days before final hearing)" 'Proceedings stayed as between Plaintiff and Second Defendant if security not provided when due' 'Plaintiff to comply with paragraph 7 of Notice to Produce issued by Second...