The Estate of Kata Sutic [2021] NSWSC 905

The Estate of Kata Sutic [2021] NSWSC 905

The Defendant's Amended Cross Claim was dismissed for want of prosecution as she effectively abandoned the claim, failed to participate or comply with orders, and her prospects were negligible. With no defence to the Plaintiffs' Amended Statement of Claim, summary judgment was granted for the Plaintiffs, declaring Radunka Rakic and Kana Andjelkovic entitled to the intestate estate. Defendant Ljiljana Bogic was ordered to repay excess funds to the estate, and indemnity costs awarded due to conduct involving Letters of Administration based on a forged document.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 June 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding / Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Cross Claim
Outcome
Cross claim dismissed; summary judgment for Plaintiffs; orders for repayment and indemnity costs.
Legal Topics
['summary Disposal' 'dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'summary Judgment' 'estate Distribution' 'intestacy' 'costs (indemnity)' 'forgery in Probate']
['civil Procedure' 'succession Law' 'equity'] ['summary Disposal' 'dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'summary Judgment' 'estate Distribution' 'intestacy' 'costs (indemnity)' 'forgery in Probate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Proceeding / Summary Judgment and Dismissal of Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Should the Defendant's Amended Cross Claim be dismissed for want of prosecution under r 12.7 UCPR?" 'Should summary judgment be granted for Plaintiffs on their Amended Statement of Claim?' 'Are the Plaintiffs entitled to distribution of the intestate estate under s 129 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)?' 'Should the Defendant be ordered to repay amounts received beyond entitlement?' 'Should indemnity costs be ordered?']

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's Amended Cross Claim was dismissed for want of prosecution as she effectively abandoned the claim, failed to participate or comply with orders, and her prospects were negligible. With no defence to the Plaintiffs' Amended Statement of Claim, summary judgment was granted for the Plaintiffs, declaring Radunka Rakic and Kana Andjelkovic entitled to the intestate estate. Defendant Ljiljana Bogic was ordered to repay excess funds to the estate, and indemnity costs awarded due to conduct involving Letters of Administration based on a forged document.

Court Disposition

Cross claim dismissed; summary judgment for Plaintiffs; orders for repayment and indemnity costs.

Orders

  • ['Amended Statement of Cross Claim dismissed for want of prosecution under Rule 12.7 UCPR.' 'Declaration that Radunka Rakic and Kana Andjelkovic are entitled to the intestate estate under s 129 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Grant of Letters of Administration to David Arthur Jackson.' 'Defendant Ljiljana Bogic...