Steven Probst and Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWIRComm 114
All documents sought under the summons to produce—specifically, the complete C@tsi files, s 181D removal documents, template documents, and related files—are apparently relevant to the substantive proceedings reviewing the s 173 disciplinary order. The summons is neither an abuse of process nor unacceptably vague, as the documents could throw light on the issues to be determined and are captured by statutory obligations of disclosure. The motion to set aside the summons is dismissed in whole.
- Parties
- Applicant (respondent to Motion): Steven Probst; Respondent (applicant on Motion): Commissioner of Police
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 174 Police Act 1990 for Review of a S 173 Order (disciplinary Transfer) / Interlocutory Motion – Determination of Notice of Motion to Set Aside Part of Summons to Produce
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Summons to Produce, Apparent Relevance of Documents, Procedural Fairness, Disciplinary Proceedings, Police Act 1990 S 173 and S 174
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Probst
Applicant (respondent to Motion)
Commissioner of Police
Respondent (applicant on Motion)
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 174 Police Act 1990 for Review of a S 173 Order (disciplinary Transfer) / Interlocutory Motion – Determination of Notice of Motion to Set Aside Part of Summons to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents sought under summons to produce are apparently relevant to the issues to be determined in the substantive review of a s 173 disciplinary order under the Police Act 1990
- 2 Whether the summons to produce constitutes an abuse of process, is too vague, or lacks legitimate forensic purpose
Ratio Decidendi
All documents sought under the summons to produce—specifically, the complete C@tsi files, s 181D removal documents, template documents, and related files—are apparently relevant to the substantive proceedings reviewing the s 173 disciplinary order. The summons is neither an abuse of process nor unacceptably vague, as the documents could throw light on the issues to be determined and are captured by statutory obligations of disclosure. The motion to set aside the summons is dismissed in whole.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed.
Orders
- Refuse to make any orders setting aside the summons to produce dated 9 June 2009.
- Dismiss the applicant's notice of motion of 25 June 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment