R v Kelly [2020] NSWDC 232
Although the offences were very serious drug supply offences requiring a sentence of imprisonment, the offender acted at a very low level under Mackay's direction, was not motivated by business profit, had significant mental health and cocaine-use issues causally affecting judgment, pleaded guilty early, was young, remorseful, of prior good character, and had made substantial rehabilitative progress. The objective seriousness was assessed as low range for count 3 and below mid-range for counts 1 and 2. Community safety and rehabilitation were better served by an intensive correction order than full-time custody because custody would remove the medical, psychological, family, employment...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted on the three counts and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 3 years, to be served by way of an intensive correction order.
- Legal Topics
- ['supply of Prohibited Drugs' 'commercial Quantity' 'large Commercial Quantity' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'form 1 Procedure' 'intensive Correction Order' 'mental Health and Moral Culpability' 'parity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 ['How the standard non-parole periods should be treated for the three drug supply offences after guilty pleas.' "The objective seriousness of the offences, including the offender's role, drug quantities, Form 1 offences, lack of profit motive, and mental health condition." "Whether the offender's depressive disorder and cocaine use reduced moral culpability and the weight to be given to denunciation and deterrence." 'Whether parity with the sentence imposed on Wylie affected the appropriate sentence.' 'Whether the sentence of imprisonment should be served by full-time custody or by intensive correction order.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offences were very serious drug supply offences requiring a sentence of imprisonment, the offender acted at a very low level under Mackay's direction, was not motivated by business profit, had significant mental health and cocaine-use issues causally affecting judgment, pleaded guilty early, was young, remorseful, of prior good character, and had made substantial rehabilitative progress. The objective seriousness was assessed as low range for count 3 and below mid-range for counts 1 and 2. Community safety and rehabilitation were better served by an intensive correction order than full-time custody because custody would remove the medical, psychological, family, employment...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted on the three counts and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 3 years, to be served by way of an intensive correction order.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of the 3 counts on the indictment, and taking into account the Form 1 offence in respect of each count, sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years.' 'The term of imprisonment is to be served by way of an intensive correction order.' 'The date of commencement of the intensive correction order...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment