R v Sinclair Hull [2023] NSWDC 199
The offence involved 992 g of methylamphetamine at 71% purity, about double the threshold for a large commercial quantity, transported using a hidden vehicle compartment and encrypted or self-deleting communications. Although the offender's role was assessed on the agreed facts as courier or runner and the objective seriousness was in the high low range, the offence was aggravated by being committed while on conditional liberty, being part of organised criminal activity and being committed for financial gain. The offender received a 25% plea discount and some allowance for remorse, limited social disadvantage, family support, employment history and special circumstances, but his prior and...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Supplying a Prohibited Drug of a Large Commercial Quantity and Breach of Community Correction Order / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted; Community Correction Order revoked; offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 8 months with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['supply Prohibited Drug' 'large Commercial Quantity' 'methylamphetamine' 'objective Seriousness' 'aggravating Factors' 'conditional Liberty' 'community Correction Order Breach' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Supplying a Prohibited Drug of a Large Commercial Quantity and Breach of Community Correction Order / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for supplying a prohibited drug of a large commercial quantity contrary to section 25(2) of the Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW).' "How the objective seriousness of the offender's role as courier or runner should be assessed." 'What weight should be given to aggravating factors, including offending while on conditional liberty, organised criminal activity and financial gain.' 'What weight should be given to subjective matters, including plea, remorse, social disadvantage, family support, employment history and prospects of rehabilitation.' 'Whether special circumstances should be found.' 'How the offender should be dealt with for breach of the Community Correction Order imposed on 10 March 2020.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence involved 992 g of methylamphetamine at 71% purity, about double the threshold for a large commercial quantity, transported using a hidden vehicle compartment and encrypted or self-deleting communications. Although the offender's role was assessed on the agreed facts as courier or runner and the objective seriousness was in the high low range, the offence was aggravated by being committed while on conditional liberty, being part of organised criminal activity and being committed for financial gain. The offender received a 25% plea discount and some allowance for remorse, limited social disadvantage, family support, employment history and special circumstances, but his prior and...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted; Community Correction Order revoked; offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 8 months with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted in respect of the section 25(2) offence.' 'The CCO imposed on 10 March 2020 is revoked, and in that regard the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of an indicative term of 2 months.' 'In respect of the section 25(2) offence the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment