R v Sinclair Hull [2023] NSWDC 199

R v Sinclair Hull [2023] NSWDC 199

The offence involved 992 g of methylamphetamine at 71% purity, about double the threshold for a large commercial quantity, transported using a hidden vehicle compartment and encrypted or self-deleting communications. Although the offender's role was assessed on the agreed facts as courier or runner and the objective seriousness was in the high low range, the offence was aggravated by being committed while on conditional liberty, being part of organised criminal activity and being committed for financial gain. The offender received a 25% plea discount and some allowance for remorse, limited social disadvantage, family support, employment history and special circumstances, but his prior and...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Supplying a Prohibited Drug of a Large Commercial Quantity and Breach of Community Correction Order / Sentence
Outcome
Offender convicted; Community Correction Order revoked; offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 8 months with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months.
Legal Topics
['supply Prohibited Drug' 'large Commercial Quantity' 'methylamphetamine' 'objective Seriousness' 'aggravating Factors' 'conditional Liberty' 'community Correction Order Breach' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Supplying a Prohibited Drug of a Large Commercial Quantity and Breach of Community Correction Order / Sentence

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for supplying a prohibited drug of a large commercial quantity contrary to section 25(2) of the Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW).' "How the objective seriousness of the offender's role as courier or runner should be assessed." 'What weight should be given to aggravating factors, including offending while on conditional liberty, organised criminal activity and financial gain.' 'What weight should be given to subjective matters, including plea, remorse, social disadvantage, family support, employment history and prospects of rehabilitation.' 'Whether special circumstances should be found.' 'How the offender should be dealt with for breach of the Community Correction Order imposed on 10 March 2020.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offence involved 992 g of methylamphetamine at 71% purity, about double the threshold for a large commercial quantity, transported using a hidden vehicle compartment and encrypted or self-deleting communications. Although the offender's role was assessed on the agreed facts as courier or runner and the objective seriousness was in the high low range, the offence was aggravated by being committed while on conditional liberty, being part of organised criminal activity and being committed for financial gain. The offender received a 25% plea discount and some allowance for remorse, limited social disadvantage, family support, employment history and special circumstances, but his prior and...

Court Disposition

Offender convicted; Community Correction Order revoked; offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 8 months with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months.

Orders

  • ['The offender is convicted in respect of the section 25(2) offence.' 'The CCO imposed on 10 March 2020 is revoked, and in that regard the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of an indicative term of 2 months.' 'In respect of the section 25(2) offence the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment...