R v Jones [2023] NSWDC 357
The offender's repeated property, driving and drug offending over a short period while on parole required a substantial custodial sentence for deterrence, accountability and protection of the community. Although the offending was generally toward the lower end of objective seriousness and totality required significant concurrency and moderation, the additional criminality was far greater than the offences already sentenced and could not be met by a non-parole period ending immediately or in the near future. Special circumstances justified a longer period of supervision to promote rehabilitation and address institutionalisation risk.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence for 17 Offences With Five Form 1 Matters, Applying Totality With Prior Sentence Imposed on 31 August 2022
- Outcome
- Offender convicted of the 17 offences and sentenced to imprisonment, with Form 1 matters taken into account. Overall, including the prior sentence, the judge considered the appropriate term to be 6.5 years with a 4-year non-parole period from 16 September 2021.
- Legal Topics
- ['supply Prohibited Drug' 'receiving Stolen Motor Vehicle' 'steal Motor Vehicle' 'steal Property' 'take and Drive a Conveyance' 'larceny' 'police Pursuit' 'break and Enter and Steal' 'destroying or Damaging Property' 'form 1 Matters' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence for 17 Offences With Five Form 1 Matters, Applying Totality With Prior Sentence Imposed on 31 August 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for 17 offences committed between April and August 2021, with five destroying property matters on Form 1s taken into account.' 'How the objective seriousness of repeated property, driving and drug supply offending should be assessed.' 'How the totality principle should apply given the offender had already been sentenced on 31 August 2022 for five other offences committed on 9 August 2021.' "What weight should be given to the offender's pleas, subjective circumstances, parole status, criminal history, rehabilitation prospects and risk of institutionalisation."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's repeated property, driving and drug offending over a short period while on parole required a substantial custodial sentence for deterrence, accountability and protection of the community. Although the offending was generally toward the lower end of objective seriousness and totality required significant concurrency and moderation, the additional criminality was far greater than the offences already sentenced and could not be met by a non-parole period ending immediately or in the near future. Special circumstances justified a longer period of supervision to promote rehabilitation and address institutionalisation risk.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted of the 17 offences and sentenced to imprisonment, with Form 1 matters taken into account. Overall, including the prior sentence, the judge considered the appropriate term to be 6.5 years with a 4-year non-parole period from 16 September 2021.
Orders
- ['Of the offences set out in the table numbered one through to 17 the offender is convicted.' 'Taking into account the Form 1 matters, the indicative sentence both before and after the 25% discount is set out in the table.' 'The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment to date from 16 September 2022 with a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment