R v Jenkinson (No. 1) [2022] NSWDC 286
The inclusive definitions in the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, particularly s 4, were not to be read down to exclude bulk vegetable matter in the form of mushrooms containing psilocybin or psilocin merely because the substances occurred naturally and were not combined by human intervention. The relevant quantity for the prosecution was therefore the 98 grams of bulk vegetable matter containing the specified prohibited drug.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Supply of a Prohibited Drug / Voir Dire/preliminary Question of Law Before Commencement of Judge Alone Trial
- Outcome
- The Court found that the quantity of drug for the purposes of the prosecution should be presented as 98 grams of the bulk vegetable matter of which the specified prohibited drug was a part.
- Legal Topics
- ['supply Prohibited Drug' 'commercial Quantity' 'admixture' 'psilocybin' 'psilocin' 'judge Alone Trial' 'voir Dire']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Supply of a Prohibited Drug / Voir Dire/preliminary Question of Law Before Commencement of Judge Alone Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the quantity of prohibited drug for the prosecution should be measured by the 98 grams of bulk mushroom vegetable matter containing psilocybin or psilocin, or only by the quantity of the active prohibited drug within that matter.' 'Whether the definition of "admixture" in s 4 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 extends to vegetable matter in which psilocybin or psilocin occurs naturally.']
Ratio Decidendi
The inclusive definitions in the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, particularly s 4, were not to be read down to exclude bulk vegetable matter in the form of mushrooms containing psilocybin or psilocin merely because the substances occurred naturally and were not combined by human intervention. The relevant quantity for the prosecution was therefore the 98 grams of bulk vegetable matter containing the specified prohibited drug.
Court Disposition
The Court found that the quantity of drug for the purposes of the prosecution should be presented as 98 grams of the bulk vegetable matter of which the specified prohibited drug was a part.
Orders
- ['Find that the quantity of drug for the purposes of this prosecution should be presented as 98 grams of the bulk vegetable matter of which the specified prohibited drug was a part.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment