Re Ashley [2023] NSWSC 1295
The absence of a signed written pre-conception surrogacy agreement did not preclude the making of a parentage order; the existence of exceptional circumstances, primarily relating to Ashley's wellbeing, family relationships and legal certainty, justified the making of the order in accordance with the best interests of the child.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Parentage Order / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Parentage order made
- Legal Topics
- ['surrogacy' 'parentage Order' 'statutory Construction' 'exceptional Circumstances' 'best Interests of the Child']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Parentage Order / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether failure to sign pre-conception surrogacy arrangement precludes parentage order' 'Whether exceptional circumstances justify making a parentage order despite non-compliance with requirement for signed written agreement' 'Application of best interests of child principle']
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of a signed written pre-conception surrogacy agreement did not preclude the making of a parentage order; the existence of exceptional circumstances, primarily relating to Ashley's wellbeing, family relationships and legal certainty, justified the making of the order in accordance with the best interests of the child.
Court Disposition
Parentage order made
Orders
- ['Order for transfer of parentage of Ashley to the First Plaintiff as mother and Second Plaintiff as father; approval of name and surname for Ashley.' 'Notice to be given to Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages in NSW, Registrar-General in ACT, and Director-General of Department of Health.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment