R v Jukes [2008] NSWSC 126
Breach of s 12 bond conditions was not trivial nor excusable under the Act; pregnancy and addiction difficulties do not constitute good reasons for excusing the breach. Sentence imposed in accordance with legislative and case law principles that require the offender to serve the suspended sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Breach of S 12 Bond
- Outcome
- Bond revoked; offender sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['suspended Sentence' 'revocation of Bond' 'manslaughter' 'sentencing Procedure' 'amphetamine Abuse' 'good Behaviour Bond Breach']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Breach of S 12 Bond
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether failure to comply with conditions of s 12 bond was trivial or excusable' 'Appropriate consequential sentence after revocation of suspended sentence bond']
Ratio Decidendi
Breach of s 12 bond conditions was not trivial nor excusable under the Act; pregnancy and addiction difficulties do not constitute good reasons for excusing the breach. Sentence imposed in accordance with legislative and case law principles that require the offender to serve the suspended sentence.
Court Disposition
Bond revoked; offender sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- ['Sentenced to imprisonment for 12 months commencing 29 November 2007 and expiring 28 November 2008 with a balance of 12 months expiring 28 November 2009' 'Earliest parole eligibility date is 28 November 2008']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment