R v Weismantel (No 3) [2015] NSWDC 227
Although the offences were serious, including three armed robberies and an attempted robbery causing grievous bodily harm, the offender was not the planner of the 23 September 2013 offences, the carjacking was near the bottom of the seriousness range, the s 98 offence was below mid-range because grievous bodily harm was not intended, and the offender's mental illness and deprived background reduced moral culpability. Balancing those matters against his criminal history, risk to the community, need for specific deterrence, parity with Roach, totality and the need for supervised rehabilitation, the Court imposed an aggregate sentence of eight years and six months with a non-parole period of...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas to Four Counts and Conviction After Judge Alone Trial on One Count
- Outcome
- Offender convicted; aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed; special circumstances found.
- Legal Topics
- ['take Vehicle Without Consent in Company' 'robbery With Offensive Weapon in Company' 'attempted Robbery With Offensive Weapon Causing Grievous Bodily Harm' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'parity' 'totality' 'mental Illness and Moral Culpability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas to Four Counts and Conviction After Judge Alone Trial on One Count
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for taking and driving a vehicle without consent in company, three robberies with an offensive weapon in company, and attempted robbery with an offensive weapon causing grievous bodily harm.' "How the objective seriousness of the carjacking and armed robberies should be assessed, including the offender's role, planning, weapons, threats, violence, victims and amounts taken." "How the offender's Aboriginal background, disturbed childhood, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, personality disorder, substance abuse and criminal history affected moral culpability, deterrence, community protection and rehabilitation." 'How parity with Daniel Roach and the totality principle affected the aggregate sentence.' 'Whether special circumstances justified a longer period on parole and a shorter non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offences were serious, including three armed robberies and an attempted robbery causing grievous bodily harm, the offender was not the planner of the 23 September 2013 offences, the carjacking was near the bottom of the seriousness range, the s 98 offence was below mid-range because grievous bodily harm was not intended, and the offender's mental illness and deprived background reduced moral culpability. Balancing those matters against his criminal history, risk to the community, need for specific deterrence, parity with Roach, totality and the need for supervised rehabilitation, the Court imposed an aggregate sentence of eight years and six months with a non-parole period of...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted; aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed; special circumstances found.
Orders
- ['Of each of the five offences discussed in the reasons for sentence, the offender is convicted.' 'The offender is sentenced to imprisonment.' 'A non-parole period of four years and six months is set, commencing on 1 March 2014 and expiring on 31 August 2018.' 'A further period of imprisonment of four years is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment