R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 8) [2019] NSWSC 1915
The Court granted a temporary stay as the degree and recentness of prejudicial publicity, which repeatedly linked the accused with high-profile corruption, created an appreciable risk to the fairness of the pending trial that could not be adequately addressed by jury direction. Deferring the trial until February 2020 would provide sufficient distance from the current wave of publicity and reduce the risk to a fair trial.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Accused: Ian Michael Macdonald; Accused: Edward Moses Obeid; Accused: Moses Edward Obeid
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Temporary Stay
- Outcome
- Temporary stay of proceedings granted
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Stay, Pre Trial Publicity, Right to Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Ian Michael Macdonald
Accused
Edward Moses Obeid
Accused
Moses Edward Obeid
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Temporary Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused's right to a fair trial is prejudiced due to intense pre-trial publicity
- 2 Whether a temporary stay of proceedings should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted a temporary stay as the degree and recentness of prejudicial publicity, which repeatedly linked the accused with high-profile corruption, created an appreciable risk to the fairness of the pending trial that could not be adequately addressed by jury direction. Deferring the trial until February 2020 would provide sufficient distance from the current wave of publicity and reduce the risk to a fair trial.
Court Disposition
Temporary stay of proceedings granted
Orders
- The notices of motion by Moses Obeid and Edward Obeid (joined by Ian Macdonald) for a temporary stay are granted.
- The trial date of 30 September 2019 is vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment