R v Bowie (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1503
Although Ms Boyd's evidence concerning alleged violence towards Judith Said had significant probative value, its probative value did not outweigh the danger of unfair prejudice because Ms Said was deceased, had given no account of violence by the accused, and could not be questioned. Parts of Donna Kuhnell's evidence were admissible where they concerned alleged violence during a continuing domestic relationship, but material not shown to have occurred during the domestic relationship or otherwise outside the Tendency Notice was inadmissible. Senior Constable Yarrow's evidence concerned a threat made after the relationship ended, fell outside the Tendency Notice, and in any event its...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceeding Concerning an Alleged Murder / Pre Trial Ruling on Admissibility of Tendency Evidence
- Outcome
- Tendency evidence admitted in part and otherwise excluded.
- Legal Topics
- ['tendency Evidence' 'domestic Violence Evidence' 'probative Value' 'unfair Prejudice' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) Ss 97 and 101']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceeding Concerning an Alleged Murder / Pre Trial Ruling on Admissibility of Tendency Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence of alleged violence by the accused towards Judith Said was admissible as tendency evidence.' "Whether parts of Donna Kuhnell's statement were admissible as tendency evidence of the accused being intentionally violent towards women with whom he was in a domestic relationship." 'Whether the statement of Senior Constable Yarrow concerning an alleged threat by the accused was admissible as tendency evidence.' 'Whether the probative value of the proposed prosecution tendency evidence outweighed the danger of unfair prejudice to the accused.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although Ms Boyd's evidence concerning alleged violence towards Judith Said had significant probative value, its probative value did not outweigh the danger of unfair prejudice because Ms Said was deceased, had given no account of violence by the accused, and could not be questioned. Parts of Donna Kuhnell's evidence were admissible where they concerned alleged violence during a continuing domestic relationship, but material not shown to have occurred during the domestic relationship or otherwise outside the Tendency Notice was inadmissible. Senior Constable Yarrow's evidence concerned a threat made after the relationship ended, fell outside the Tendency Notice, and in any event its...
Court Disposition
Tendency evidence admitted in part and otherwise excluded.
Orders
- ['The evidence relating to the alleged violence against Judith Said is inadmissible as tendency evidence.' 'The evidence contained in the statement of Donna Kuhnell, dated 19 August 2022: paragraphs [7] and [8] are admissible as tendency evidence.' 'In respect of paragraphs [12] and [13] of the statement of Donna...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment