Westralian Farmers Limited v Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in Liquidation) [1936] HCA 6

Westralian Farmers Limited v Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in Liquidation) [1936] HCA 6

The obligation to pay commission on the thirty-two tractors arose before the agency agreement ended (goods had been ordered and delivered to the defendant before termination); payment was merely postponed until arrival in Australia, and contract termination did not extinguish accrued rights. Adelaide-supplied tractors were not supplied under the agency agreement and thus do not count towards the minimum quota.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: Westralian Farmers Limited; Respondent/plaintiff: Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in liquidation)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the High Court of Australia on Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Termination of Contract, Agency Agreements, Commission Payments, Effect of Resolutive Conditions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Westralian Farmers Limited

Appellant/defendant

Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in liquidation)

Respondent/plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment of the High Court of Australia on Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia

  1. 1 Whether commission was payable on goods delivered after the termination of the agency agreement caused by a resolutive condition
  2. 2 Whether supplying tractors from plaintiff’s Adelaide stock counted towards contractual minimum obligations
  3. 3 Whether obligations that were contingent but not yet due at contract termination survive termination

Ratio Decidendi

The obligation to pay commission on the thirty-two tractors arose before the agency agreement ended (goods had been ordered and delivered to the defendant before termination); payment was merely postponed until arrival in Australia, and contract termination did not extinguish accrued rights. Adelaide-supplied tractors were not supplied under the agency agreement and thus do not count towards the minimum quota.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment for the respondent (plaintiff) for £1,051 9s. 1d.
  • Appellant to pay costs