Westralian Farmers Limited v Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in Liquidation) [1936] HCA 6
The obligation to pay commission on the thirty-two tractors arose before the agency agreement ended (goods had been ordered and delivered to the defendant before termination); payment was merely postponed until arrival in Australia, and contract termination did not extinguish accrued rights. Adelaide-supplied tractors were not supplied under the agency agreement and thus do not count towards the minimum quota.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Westralian Farmers Limited; Respondent/plaintiff: Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the High Court of Australia on Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Contract, Agency Agreements, Commission Payments, Effect of Resolutive Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westralian Farmers Limited
Appellant/defendant
Commonwealth Agricultural Service Engineers Limited (in liquidation)
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the High Court of Australia on Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether commission was payable on goods delivered after the termination of the agency agreement caused by a resolutive condition
- 2 Whether supplying tractors from plaintiff’s Adelaide stock counted towards contractual minimum obligations
- 3 Whether obligations that were contingent but not yet due at contract termination survive termination
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to pay commission on the thirty-two tractors arose before the agency agreement ended (goods had been ordered and delivered to the defendant before termination); payment was merely postponed until arrival in Australia, and contract termination did not extinguish accrued rights. Adelaide-supplied tractors were not supplied under the agency agreement and thus do not count towards the minimum quota.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for the respondent (plaintiff) for £1,051 9s. 1d.
- Appellant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment