Shanmugathaas v Paramanirupan [2018] NSWSC 1232
The partnership was for the development of the property followed by the sale of the units in accordance with the Agreement, not merely completion of construction or subdivision. Because the units had not been sold by June 2016 or October 2016, s 32(b) did not dissolve the partnership on either date. The Deed of Settlement and Release did not effect an immediate compromise or release; dissolution would have occurred only after the agreed process and payments, and the Deed was unenforceable. The partnership therefore continued until dissolved by the parties' agreement recorded in the orders of 10 July 2018. For the winding up, Unit 2 was to be valued as at 13 March 2017, and no additional...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Partnership Dispute Concerning Dissolution and Winding Up of a Property Development Venture / Principal Judgment Resolving Date of Dissolution and Valuation Date After Consent Orders Appointing Receivers
- Outcome
- Partnership declared dissolved by agreement on 10 July 2018; valuation date for Unit 2 fixed at 13 March 2017; no additional earlier valuation ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Partnership' 'single Adventure or Undertaking' 'partnership Winding Up' 'valuation of Partnership Property' 'deed of Settlement and Release']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Partnership Dispute Concerning Dissolution and Winding Up of a Property Development Venture / Principal Judgment Resolving Date of Dissolution and Valuation Date After Consent Orders Appointing Receivers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the partnership was dissolved before 10 July 2018, and if so on what date.' 'Whether the partnership was dissolved under Partnership Act 1892 (NSW), s 32(b) when activity ceased, when proceedings commenced, or when the Deed of Settlement and Release was entered.' 'What date should be used for valuation of Unit 2 for the winding up.' 'Whether an additional valuation of the property should be ordered as at 6 October 2013 or 18 October 2014.']
Ratio Decidendi
The partnership was for the development of the property followed by the sale of the units in accordance with the Agreement, not merely completion of construction or subdivision. Because the units had not been sold by June 2016 or October 2016, s 32(b) did not dissolve the partnership on either date. The Deed of Settlement and Release did not effect an immediate compromise or release; dissolution would have occurred only after the agreed process and payments, and the Deed was unenforceable. The partnership therefore continued until dissolved by the parties' agreement recorded in the orders of 10 July 2018. For the winding up, Unit 2 was to be valued as at 13 March 2017, and no additional...
Court Disposition
Partnership declared dissolved by agreement on 10 July 2018; valuation date for Unit 2 fixed at 13 March 2017; no additional earlier valuation ordered.
Orders
- ['Declare that the partnership between the parties was dissolved by agreement of the parties on 10 July 2018.' 'Direct that, for the purposes of the valuation to be conducted in accordance with paragraph 5(c) of the orders made on 10 July 2018, the date of valuation shall be 13 March 2017.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment