Worth v Clasohm [1952] HCA 67
The evidence did not sufficiently establish that, at the date of her will, Mary Jane Worth lacked testamentary capacity. The delusions and senility referred to were not shown to interfere with the actual testamentary act or the rationality of its provisions. The suspicious circumstances arising from the beneficiary drafting the will were adequately removed. The appeal succeeds and probate is granted.
- Parties
- Appellant; Plaintiff: Frank Lindsey Worth; Respondent; Defendant: William Clasohm; Respondent; Defendant: Henry Clasohm
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 1952
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Burden of Proof, Execution of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frank Lindsey Worth
Appellant; Plaintiff
William Clasohm
Respondent; Defendant
Henry Clasohm
Respondent; Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testatrix, Mary Jane Worth, possessed testamentary capacity at the time of executing her will dated 14 December 1949
- 2 Whether the will was duly executed according to law
- 3 Who bears the onus of proof in challenging testamentary capacity when doubt is raised
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not sufficiently establish that, at the date of her will, Mary Jane Worth lacked testamentary capacity. The delusions and senility referred to were not shown to interfere with the actual testamentary act or the rationality of its provisions. The suspicious circumstances arising from the beneficiary drafting the will were adequately removed. The appeal succeeds and probate is granted.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Probate of the will of Mary Jane Worth dated 14 December 1949 to be granted
- Decision of Supreme Court of South Australia set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment