Landers v Landers [1914] HCA 74
The evidence did not justify the inference that any insane delusion existed when the testator gave instructions for or executed the will. The testator was sober and competent on those occasions, and the expressions of delusion occurred only during drunken bouts. Thus, the testator had testamentary capacity, and the decision denying probate was erroneous.
- Parties
- Appellants/plaintiffs: John Landers and John Gillett; Respondent/defendant: Ada Adeline Landers
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Final Appellate Disposition by the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Judgment below reversed. Probate granted.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Insane Delusion, Burden of Proof, Drunkenness and Testamentary Intent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Landers and John Gillett
Appellants/plaintiffs
Ada Adeline Landers
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Final Appellate Disposition by the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testator, Peter Landers, was of sound and disposing mind and memory when he gave instructions for and executed his will, or was affected by an insane delusion regarding his wife allegedly trying to poison him
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not justify the inference that any insane delusion existed when the testator gave instructions for or executed the will. The testator was sober and competent on those occasions, and the expressions of delusion occurred only during drunken bouts. Thus, the testator had testamentary capacity, and the decision denying probate was erroneous.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Judgment below reversed. Probate granted.
Orders
- Judgment appealed from discharged
- Probate of the will granted to John Landers and John Gillett
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment