Sharma v Soar Aviation Aircraft Holdings Pty Ltd & Anor [2024] NSWDC 567
Leave is granted to join the insurer as a defendant under ss 4 and 5 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW), on the basis that an arguable case exists against the insured, there is a reasonable possibility the insured cannot satisfy a judgment, and an arguable case that the policy responds; leave to plead an alternative negligence claim is not futile as statutory exclusivity depends on factual findings; discontinuance against the original defendants is appropriate with no order as to costs.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Nandini Sharma; Second Plaintiff: Rajneesh Sharma; Third Plaintiff: Shivank Sharma; First Defendant: Soar Aviation Aircraft Holdings Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Gobel Aviation Pty Ltd trading as Soar Advanced Flight Training; Respondent to Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Join Insurer/plead Alternative Claim/discontinue Against Existing Defendants
- Outcome
- Leave granted to join insurer; leave granted to discontinue against existing defendants; leave granted to plead alternative negligence claim; costs of motion to be costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Claims Against Insurers, Carriers' Liability, Nervous Shock, Negligence, Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nandini Sharma
First Plaintiff
Rajneesh Sharma
Second Plaintiff
Shivank Sharma
Third Plaintiff
Soar Aviation Aircraft Holdings Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Gobel Aviation Pty Ltd trading as Soar Advanced Flight Training
Second Defendant
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Respondent to Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Join Insurer/plead Alternative Claim/discontinue Against Existing Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to join the insurer as a defendant under Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW)
- 2 Whether plaintiffs should have leave to discontinue against existing defendants
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to plead an alternative negligence claim
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted to join the insurer as a defendant under ss 4 and 5 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW), on the basis that an arguable case exists against the insured, there is a reasonable possibility the insured cannot satisfy a judgment, and an arguable case that the policy responds; leave to plead an alternative negligence claim is not futile as statutory exclusivity depends on factual findings; discontinuance against the original defendants is appropriate with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to join insurer; leave granted to discontinue against existing defendants; leave granted to plead alternative negligence claim; costs of motion to be costs in the cause.
Orders
- Grant leave pursuant to ss 4 and 5 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) to join Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London as the third defendant to these proceedings.
- Grant leave to the plaintiffs to discontinue these proceedings against the first defendant and the second defendant, with no order as to costs between those parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment