Olde v Metro Surf Australia Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 618
Metro Surf Australia Pty Limited had no demonstrated continuing right to occupy the property. Obnova Concrete Pty Limited had no lease and at best held a contractual licence to occupy, which bound the receivers only to the extent that it was terminable on reasonable notice. The notices requiring vacation within four days and then two weeks were not reasonable, but a period of six weeks was sufficient and generous in the circumstances, so an order for possession was made requiring vacant possession by 13 July.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Summons for Possession of Land by Receivers Appointed by Mortgagee / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Order for possession made.
- Legal Topics
- ['torrens Title' 'receivers Appointed by Mortgagee' 'possession of Land' 'lease and Licence Distinction' 'contractual Licence' 'termination of Licence' 'reasonable Notice' 'vacant Possession']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Summons for Possession of Land by Receivers Appointed by Mortgagee / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Metro Surf Australia Pty Limited had any right to occupy the property.' 'Whether Obnova Concrete Pty Limited had a leasehold interest or only a licence to occupy the property.' 'Whether the receivers, as agents of the mortgagor, were bound by rights arising under agreements between the mortgagor and the defendants.' "Whether notice given to terminate Obnova Concrete Pty Limited's licence was reasonable." 'What period was reasonable for Obnova Concrete Pty Limited to vacate and remove its materials from the property.']
Ratio Decidendi
Metro Surf Australia Pty Limited had no demonstrated continuing right to occupy the property. Obnova Concrete Pty Limited had no lease and at best held a contractual licence to occupy, which bound the receivers only to the extent that it was terminable on reasonable notice. The notices requiring vacation within four days and then two weeks were not reasonable, but a period of six weeks was sufficient and generous in the circumstances, so an order for possession was made requiring vacant possession by 13 July.
Court Disposition
Order for possession made.
Orders
- ['The defendants give possession of the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio Identifier 67/608085 to the plaintiffs by 13 July.' 'Liberty to apply as to enforcement of the order.' "The defendant to pay the plaintiffs' costs." 'Exhibits can be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment