Southcorp Brands Pty Ltd v Australia Rush Rich Winery Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 720
The respondents' use of the Chinese character marks, particularly 奔富 and derivations, on wine labels was use 'as a trade mark', and those marks are substantially identical with or deceptively similar to Southcorp's registered trade marks for PENFOLDS, BEN FU, and 奔富. The use would cause confusion among Mandarin and Cantonese speaking consumers, especially given the phonetic equivalence and consumer practices in Australia. The evidence showed deliberate adoption of the impugned marks to misappropriate Southcorp's reputation. The cross-claim to revoke two trade marks lacked merit, as Southcorp had long used and intended to use the marks. Requests to dispense with corporate legal...
- Parties
- Applicant / Cross Respondent: Southcorp Brands Pty Ltd; First Respondent / First Cross Claimant: Australia Rush Rich Winery Pty Ltd; Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant: Australia R&R Group Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Rush Rich International Trading Inc., Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Eastern Tomorrow (Jinjiang) Import and Export Co., Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (trade Marks) Summary Judgment & Cross Claim / Judgment Following Interlocutory Application for Summary and Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for applicant; cross-claim dismissed; injunctions and monetary relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Summary Judgment, Default Judgment, Trade Mark Infringement, Foreign Languages in Trade Marks, Corporate Representation in Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southcorp Brands Pty Ltd
Applicant / Cross Respondent
Australia Rush Rich Winery Pty Ltd
First Respondent / First Cross Claimant
Australia R&R Group Pty Ltd
Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant
Rush Rich International Trading Inc., Ltd
Third Respondent
Eastern Tomorrow (Jinjiang) Import and Export Co., Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (trade Marks) Summary Judgment & Cross Claim / Judgment Following Interlocutory Application for Summary and Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents infringed Southcorp's registered trade marks by use of certain Chinese character marks on wine labels.
- 2 Whether alleged infringing Chinese character marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, Southcorp's marks.
- 3 Whether use constitutes use 'as a trade mark' under Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth).
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents' use of the Chinese character marks, particularly 奔富 and derivations, on wine labels was use 'as a trade mark', and those marks are substantially identical with or deceptively similar to Southcorp's registered trade marks for PENFOLDS, BEN FU, and 奔富. The use would cause confusion among Mandarin and Cantonese speaking consumers, especially given the phonetic equivalence and consumer practices in Australia. The evidence showed deliberate adoption of the impugned marks to misappropriate Southcorp's reputation. The cross-claim to revoke two trade marks lacked merit, as Southcorp had long used and intended to use the marks. Requests to dispense with corporate legal...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for applicant; cross-claim dismissed; injunctions and monetary relief granted.
Orders
- Summary judgment in favour of the Applicant against all Respondents under r 26.01(1)(e) Federal Court Rules and s 31A(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
- First and Second Respondents' cross-claim dismissed (r 5.23(1)(b) Federal Court Rules 2011).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment